For a sense of the extent of the districting advantage, consider that Republicans lost the presidency, the Senate, and the popular vote for the House of Representatives in 2012, but still came away with a 33-seat majority in the House. House of Representatives - a number that's unlikely to significantly change in the foreseeable future given that most House seats have solid partisan majorities and that GOP allies in statehouses have drawn a majority of the districts. The equations would quickly change.īut, to pave the way for such a possibility, we need to reckon with a whole different kind of math: Electoral returns and Congressional whip counts as well as atmospheric gasses.Īmerica's party of climate skepticism, the GOP, now controls 246 out of 435 seats in the U.S. If, as McKibben advocated in his article, the world's leading emitters, including the United States, put a price on carbon through a tax or another method, it would enlist markets around the world in the fight against global warming. Leading scientists announced on Wednesday that 2015 was, by far, the hottest year since we've been keeping records. Since McKibben laid out his math in 2012, we've added huge new quantities of greenhouse gasses to the air and fossil fuel companies have continued exploring for new reserves. In Paris last month, countries reached consensus that warming actually shouldn't exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius - a level at which some low-lying areas could start to disappear and at which global food and water systems would come under serious stress. Since then, the equation has only gotten harder to solve.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |